What we have done

Known gaps

We have not yet run a full audit with assistive technology users, and automated checks are not the same as someone actually using the site. The calculators are the most likely place for problems, because live-updating results are easy to get wrong for screen reader users even when the markup looks correct.

Fonts are currently a system stack rather than the self-hosted faces specified for the design. That is a fidelity gap rather than an accessibility one, and it means the site loads faster than specified in the meantime.

Reporting a problem

If something here is hard or impossible to use, tell us and describe what happened and what you were using. Accessibility reports are treated like factual corrections: they go to the top of the queue ahead of new writing.